BPMN 2.0 convention for embedded subprocess

cancel
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Did you mean: 
Highlighted
Member II

BPMN 2.0 convention for embedded subprocess

Jump to solution

Question BPMN convetion. Please see the screenshot as follows:

From the above screenshot - is it permissible to have a flow going backards to main process activity from Deficiency process formalities subprocess? Is it following the conventions of BPMN2.0?

1 Solution

Accepted Solutions
Highlighted
Senior Member II

Re: BPMN 2.0 convention for embedded subprocess

Jump to solution

The way you did the loop back to "Examine formal requirements" from "Deficiency process formalities" is valid. However the way you have multiple incoming transitions into "Examine formal requirements" (not fully visible in attached diagram) can cause issues. It is best to merge them using some sort of gateway and have one incoming path into that task.

Ciju

View solution in original post

1 Reply
Highlighted
Senior Member II

Re: BPMN 2.0 convention for embedded subprocess

Jump to solution

The way you did the loop back to "Examine formal requirements" from "Deficiency process formalities" is valid. However the way you have multiple incoming transitions into "Examine formal requirements" (not fully visible in attached diagram) can cause issues. It is best to merge them using some sort of gateway and have one incoming path into that task.

Ciju

View solution in original post